Hey, so it’s been awhile.
Life and work intruded. But our
genealogy hasn’t changed, and our knowledge especially of our ancient genealogy
based on our DNA continues to evolve.
This article is a continuation of our look at Vance DNA
Groups 1 and 2 within what’s called the L513 SNP. To see
more about that SNP and these two groups in general, see our first article on
Y-DNA testing. Here I’ll talk about what
we know about Group 1, which is important partly because it includes the lineal
heir of the Scottish Lairds of Barnbarroch, and so has been tied to the
traditional descent of the Vance surname.
If you need a refresher on that Vance history, read our explanation of A Short History of the Vance Surname.
The coming of “affordable” (meaning less than about $600) exploratory
Y-DNA testing in recent years has generated an explosion of Y-DNA testing by
people hoping to find out more about their male-line genealogy. Under
L21 alone there are more than 14,000 men currently recorded in the DNA project
database. That’s a lot, but it only scratches the
surface of the total population of L21 men among the 3.5+ billion men in the
world. The more people test their DNA,
the more our knowledge of the origins and spread of our ancient genealogy
increases.
I say “ancient” because what Y-DNA testing has told us so
far is mainly about our male-line genealogy back before surnames were first
adopted about 1000 years ago. We are only just starting to see clues to where
these male lines have been living from about 1000AD forward.
So what of Group 1 specifically? In Y-DNA terms, the Group 1 members of the
Vance/Vans/etc surname project are part of what has been known until now as the
L193 subgroup of L513. The L193 subgroup
is known as a “superfamily” of various Scottish family names with a strong
association with southwest Scotland near Ayrshire and Galloway (although as I
said in the first article, its origins are still under fierce debate). The current structure for this sub-tree of
L513 looks like this:
What does this mean?
So adding a few (approximate) timelines to the tree, the story unfolds
like this:
Some time about 500 AD (give or take a few hundred years) a
man was born with the L193 SNP mutation.
His descendants appear to be of uniformly Scottish origin, so perhaps (more about this later) he was
born in Scotland. At some point however
before or around 1000AD, one of his descendants was born with the A3 SNP
mutation. HIS descendants then split
into two lines – one became the Vans/Vance line which includes today’s Vans of
Barnbarroch families, and the others split into two lines themselves, one of
which gained family names of Clendaniel, Glendinning, McVittie (and others),
and the other which became family lines of Kennedy, Little, Taylor, and
Beatty.
Working backwards, we know that some of the Vances in Group
1 can trace their ancestry back to the 1700s, so clearly the A3 SNP line was
part of the Vans surname for several hundred years. And in fact, the split into Vance Group 1a
and 1b is also very old (probably back to the 1300-1400s), so we can be pretty
sure that A3 was the DNA of the male line of the Vans family of Barnbarroch
back to around the time that
Barnbarroch was founded. Other scenarios
are possible in theory, but they’re just too much of a stretch.
One conclusion (that we already pretty much knew) is that any male Vances whose DNA testing show they are part of Group 1 are directly related to the Vans family of Barnbarroch. We don’t know yet how Group 1b broke off from the Barnbarroch line, but they are all related to a man who was either a Vans of Dirleton or of Barnbarroch and who broke off of the main Barnbarroch line very early on.
One conclusion (that we already pretty much knew) is that any male Vances whose DNA testing show they are part of Group 1 are directly related to the Vans family of Barnbarroch. We don’t know yet how Group 1b broke off from the Barnbarroch line, but they are all related to a man who was either a Vans of Dirleton or of Barnbarroch and who broke off of the main Barnbarroch line very early on.
But the Vans line of Barnbarroch was supposed to be founded
by the Vans of Dirleton, who themselves were a Norman family who reached
Scotland sometime around 1100-1200. If
the L193 and A3 lines look like they are of old Scottish origin, does this mean
that the ancestry of the Vans of Barnbarroch is NOT Norman?
Possibly, but not necessarily. Of course, it IS possible that the Vans of
Dirleton or Barnbarroch adopted a son from an ancient Scottish line who brought
the A3 SNP into the family DNA. That was
not uncommon in medieval times and might not have been recorded. But movement between the British Isles and
the European continent was VERY common for thousands of years before and during
this time. L513 descendants, for instance
(but not yet L193 descendants) have been found in Scandinavia, Germany, Belgium,
and other parts of Europe besides England, Scotland, and Ireland. It is not inconceivable that a L193
descendant might have emigrated to Scandinavia or Europe and his line some few
hundred years later came back to Scotland among the Norman settlers. An interesting event if it occurred, but
certainly within possibility.
What would help? Well
it would certainly help to locate and test a known male descendant of the Vans of
Dirleton. That would tell us whether the
Barnbarroch and Dirleton lines were in fact related. And certainly testing a known male descendant of
the de Vaux of Normandy would be a coup also.
Without having those to tell us how the Vans/Vance lines
evolved, our best chance at learning more about these lines is just for more
men to continue to have their Y-DNA tested and having more L193 descendants
identified. For instance, finding
European descendants of the A3 SNP would help us understand more about the
spread of this subgroup that includes the Vances of Group 1.